>>21538857
>not with fucking India
Well, why not? India was brought up >>21538280 as having low meat consumption and low life expectancy. If you're going to talk about meat consumption and colon cancer then it seems relevant to point out India has low rates of colon cancer despite low meat consumption if you're trying to say meat is preventative.

>Spain doesn't have significantly worse healthcare than Sweden, and eats twice the amount of meat.
73 to 99 isn't double, and that's not a great comparison anyway

>>21538869
>A country represents all sorts of people.
And the blue zone countries aren't even all on the same continent, but they have things in common in lifestyle and diet. Seems like there could be something to it.