>>512273425
>Why are men forcefully drafted, but women are not?
Some are more equal than others.
Ignoring the nonsense you prefaced the question with, the reason is simple.
Wars are supposed to be to protect the people first and advance state second.
The people need fertile women to still give births at home, this is primarily what protecting the people means.
You secure the existence of your people by keeping your women within your people and kill those who try to poach them.
Men are in this regard the most capable, but more importantly also the most disposable.
The advancement of the state refers to the ability for the state to secure good living standards for the people and ability to protect them.
Same thing here, men are the most disposable but these wars should be by career soldiers and volunteers.
The moment a state drafts women it will sacrifice the people existence for its own.
This makes the state a bigger threat to the people than the enemy.
And there is your answer.
This also coincides with the lack of will to fight for ones country in the west.
Our regimes have for generations now (but in hyperspeed the last decades) sacrificed their people and invited complete foreigners, allowing them to pillage and rape said women.
While at the same time encouraging the women to not have children and pitting them against the male population.
This means that only the professional soldier class/mercenary class is still interested in fighting for the country (in practice, whoever can pay them and allow them to do war stuff without consequence).
Everyone else sees the government as a bigger existential threat than any invader.
So we see less than 16% being willing to fight for Germany... and why would they?
The government explicitly prioritizes itself over its constituents, and it prioritizes foreign interests over its own people.
