>>214015264
Here's the global immunity clause they tried to sneak passed a judge to stop investigations into the Biden family. They literally gave the judge a copy of the agreement that didn't contain the clause and Hunter's lawyers called the court to have evidence removed saying it was on behalf of the prosecution.

Here's a brief rundown:
>the judge was appointed by Trump but anyone who has taken a civics course knows senators have veto power (both are Democrats and the judge herself is a Democrat)
>the DOJ refused to release the plea agreement to the public (it leaked after the hearing)
>the night before the hearing a member of the defense called the court saying they were acting on behalf of the prosecution
>their aim was to have evidence removed from the docket (this evidence related to recent congressional whistleblower testimony and shed light on future crimes Hunter could be charged with)
>they were threatened with sanctions; it really highlighted the shenanigans revolving around future immunity
>the immunity clause was hidden in the diversion agreement which both sides expected to be rubber-stamped
>the judge was not even given the agreement containing the immunity clause until just before the hearing
>Hunter and his lawyers shook hands with the prosecution (kek)
>the prosecution was asked multiple times if anything like this agreement had been done before and the answer was no
>the prosecution was put on the spot about future immunity specifically about FARA charges and had to answer those things could still be charged
HUNTER REJECTED THE PLEA BECAUSE FUTURE IMMUNITY WAS TAKEN OFF THE TABLE
>the judge also rejected the agreement because it made her responsible for any prosecution which was unconstitutional