>>538651528
>Well I'm definetly better at the subject than you.
your character doesn't even look remotely like cro-magnon reconstructions. Couldn't even have done a google search? Pic related is a reconstruction of a cro-magnon from 1916.
Yours looks like skin stretched over bone, lacking facial muscles. It's no better than one of those shrink-wrapped drawings of a T. rex.
>This is evident in the way we describe people with perceived neanderthal-like features or in the use of the term "neanderthal" as an insult to imply lack of intelligence or sophistication.
Fairly certain that's because they're extinct and the belief stemmed from a period in time where we thought that things that went extinct were objectively shit at everything. Ideas like "the dinosaurs went extinct because they evolved useless body parts" and all that.
It's not because of an innate perception that neanderthals are ugly, especially when you consider the lack of a global beauty standard (especially prior to the globalisation of information)