>>3984292
I've gone on dates with my female co-workers before, but otherwise I'm comfortable being single. It's the best option right now regarding the current state of the economy and our lack of attention and care to childhood. Most people unfortunately only reproduce because of how strong their libido is at the moment, letting it control their desires and subconscious to the point that it takes over and they're able to say things like: "Oh, yeah, you were totally planned and everything, son." I'm past the age that most girls would find me attractive anyway, and right now I'm just concerned with trying to get by and be content with what the good things I do have.

>>3973239
It's apparently a baffling concept to a lot of people, a lot of straight people included. The idea that a straight man can't find boys beautiful should be ridiculous on face value if one were to just think about the history of art and literature centered on cute boys. Caravaggio, anyone? The problem in our modern culture is that we impose sexuality on normal feelings that are not inherently sexual. I find cities, overgrowth on buildings, and old architecture very beautiful. Does that mean I have a sexual attraction to these things? Obviously not. So why is it that a man's affinity for the male youth or boyhood in general suddenly has to be sexual?