>>9016596
yeah, I've tried that model and it's maybe the 2nd best behind seedream but it's a distant 2nd (although it's a lot cheaper). The realism isn't quite the same, it's close but it's still clearly CGI whereas Seedream really looks like real people. But the biggest difference is adhering to prompts. Seedream is just far better than anything else in strict adherence to prompts (at least for non-NSFW). Especially with multiple characters, Seedream can adhere to individual prompts with 6 different people while every other model will mix attributes between the characters or not even have some of the characters. Seedream is also good at prompts for specific facial expressions and poses that other models aren't good at. Idk, Seedream is basically perfect except that for whatever reason it's terrible if you try making porn with it.

Pic-related was the exact same prompt as >>9016460. I did another generation that was more accurate for the blowjob but there still wasn't a second woman and it still didn't really seem photorealistic like Seedream. The seedream got everything right except for the blowjob itself.

>>9016539
>>9016554
I just tried Chroma. It's even more expensive than Seedream (50 buzz vs 40 per image) and it won't generate, it looks like it's at least temporarily down.
>Unstable Resources
>The following resources are experiencing a high generation failure rate, possibly due to temporary generator instability. This usually resolves with time and does not require action from you. This notice will be removed once performance stabilizes.
and then when I try to generate it doesn't and gives this:
>This is taking longer than usual. Don't want to wait? Cancel this job to get refunded for any undelivered images. If we aren't done by 1:23am we'll refund you automatically.
so, idk, maybe it's temporary or maybe it's not supported anymore.