>>4455691
>be you
>jeet
>having a 24/7 meltdown over pancake lenses
>it is pointed out by 200 iq white chads that paying twice as much money to make an already small lens negligibly smaller is either consumerist idiocy or for people who are so frail and malnourished that 1.2oz is perceptible without the aid of a scale
>"no ur the jeet! saars you must consoom the newest tech! newer thinner iphoon! newer thinner camerar lense!"
Pancake lenses for large sensor mirrorless cameras are consumerist toys. Fashion accessories.

If you actually cared about having a small camera instead of mindlessly buying whatever ars technica is reporting on at the moment, you would have already had a ricoh GR.

>>4442671
>We're destroying the environment and depleting rare earth reserves with a never ending tide of consumer ewaste but ITS PROSPERITY OK
No.

I would actually be 100% okay with a NWO moratorium on consumer technology development until existing stocks of digital cameras, smartphones, laptops, PMPs, and PCs are inoperable and recycled. But jacking prices through the roof to destroy demand has the exact same effect without the same precedent.