>>34238971
>eh christians are also very ban heavy
Libtards literally hate the first amendment and want to control speech and thought. What's your point, if you even have one?
>i know that its not worth bandying crooked words with a witless worm
>mfw
So don't, just answer a simple question: how are women in America oppressed? You won't, and we both know it, because the position that women are oppressed in current year is not, and has never been, about arguing a position that is fair, factual, or defensible. It's emotional blackmail, plain and simple.

>>34238976
I would argue politics in general are a scam; anyone who thinks politicians give a single isolated fuck about making things better for the plebeians is a fool. Still, between the two parties it's crystal clear which is the lesser evil, or at the very least, which one isn't actively working against my interests.

>>34238986
>but for a large portion of them it isn't true
For the sake of keeping our eyes on the ball, let's just say you're right; who cares? You don't need the approval and desire of every woman, and I promise you if your body, mind, and finances are in order, you won't long want for female company.