>>535533253
>What would need to happen to be actually rape, then?
Consider that rape isn't driven by reproductive instinct, but instead a desire to push power dynamics to the extreme. Even if you were to castrate a convicted rapist and deprive him of his ability to reproduce, he would still be inclined to carry out rape simply because the act of it makes him feel unequivocally dominant in an area of his life that offers no sense of control to the other party. In contrast, the Cuckoospawn don't spend any more time than they need to on their victims. They "seize the nest" of the human body, plant the eggs inside, and then move on to the next victim. Again, this is all done on pure instinct, so there's no way it can constitute as rape or even a "rape allegory"
If this is something that boggles your mind then I suggest you grow the fuck up
>>535533484
Understand that it is the xitterfags that are legitimately trying to say that the original intent was for the Cuckoospawn was for them to be a genuine allegory to rape when that is not at all the case
Calling them rapebirds is a funny as a joke, but to try and apply the concept onto them as if it were the genuine intent from the writers is the true delusion here