>>938210550
This kind of situation usually stems from a break in harmony with the world order because of high intelligence that sees fools instead of systems that prevent fools from being foolish.

Acknowledge the system as a placeholder for the virtues of all levels of design and seek that level which will free you from your shackles.

>>938198850
The strategic application of definitions of intellectual progression allows for the systematic revelation of knowledge in line with those systems to come to pass.

In short.
I think, therefore I am.

>>936275547
Barnes, you got me, I concede my argument, because I can see that you have the best intentions, and I will go to war, but you can stay if I am in command.

Since we are equal rank and we do not orchestrate this shit show, it would still seem that troops will potentially die.

What I think the command is doing is analysing threat potential and sending forces where threats to civilians are gaining too much momentum to ignore.

Since WW2 we have adopted the common stance that genocide is an evil and heinous act that cannot be allowed to grow in effect when we can change it.

So it would appear the battles will be small because the satellite surveillance of massive enemy movements indicates when the threat is getting too vast.

So whilst I will not promote speeding it up, we must counter before the threats are too large to manage without massive casualties.

War is peace.

Chris, you seem to be floating on a river of inconsequence that will take you to a sea of no difference.

We all talk the talk, we all walk the walk, but who will ever take the hill?