>>513462576
Ah, but Russia can impose their will on Ukraine, while the reverse is not true. Since you sit and spam the catalog all day (you're a very recognizable poster) I already know what you're going to say:
>if Russia can take Slavyansk/Kramatorsk, why haven't they done so yet?
You see, people with triple digit IQs are able to do something called "abstraction" and use available information to try and predict events that may happen in the future. For people who do not possess this ability (i.e. niggers), thinking about things that do not exist/have not happened yet is very difficult, impossible even.
This difference in ability to think abstractly is why people who predicted that places like Severodonetsk, Soledar, Bakhmut, Avdeevka, Chasov Yar, Ugledar, etc, would eventually fall to the Russians were right, while people who spent that same time saying that these places would never fall (because it hadn't happened yet) were wrong. The problem is that they don't understand WHY they were wrong, and therefore can't learn from their mistakes. It's not their fault, they simply never developed this ability because they had no need for it. Other people (i.e. whites), on the other hand, evolved under circumstances in which they had to consider what would happen if they didn't build stout houses and store enough fuel and food for the winter.
>tl;dr:
How would you feel if Russia did take Kramatorsk?
