>>40959488
>no one who just uses a quiz includes their tritype and instinctual variant
Yes they do. Combining questionable test results is how 90% of self-typers go about it, and you've failed to explain how else you've come to your conclusions, presumably because your methods are shaky at best, but hey, I'm all ears.
>i assure you it is correct
And just how would you do that? I won't just believe you intrinsically.
>and yes the odds of me seeing a single person with a highly unusual chart that is very similar to mine, also having a very unusual combination of personality traits (not just intp, all of them)
You may have an unusual chart but your personality type, even down to the tritype and instinctual variants, are an extremely common result among the types of people that are interested in personality theory and astrology in the first place, so it is really not all that surprising.
>Would be nice if there was a full dataset of natal charts, mbti, enneagram type. Would be pretty feasible to build it from known celebrity charts + personality db at least I suspect we'd find some pretty clear correlations.
This seems like it would be a worth endeavor.
>For the more obvious ennegram/mbti correlation I think there is actually a pretty significant ethnic/genetic component to that at least within certain populations where they are more prevalent
This seems likely. The distribution among the sexes is interesting as well. Certain combos just don't seem to exist in a general sense, and specific MBTI types don't exist among women. Specifically I find all of the INTP/ENTP women on the database to be questionable typing. From my read no xNTP woman exists. Maybe I'm just incredulous? It's interesting that INTJ/ENTJ women do seem to exist in my view, so it's not down to intelligence alone. I'm not sure why specifically women seem to lack the xNTP disposition, but that's just my opinion.