>>17970351
If you think you can get a model that fully describes the uni (even the indescribable part), you're going to be spinnin' your wheels in the wrong direction your entire life like Joscha Bach: Model Man.

>look ma, I played with my models again all day and all decade/century and still didn't solve the "hard problem of consciousness!"
>guess I'll quadruple down and prove Einstein's definition of insanity!

>>715861598
>Isaac Jewton

>>507295115
>You believe in nukes because dutifully following the science babble lets you believe you're smart
that describes most people, doesn't it? even people with high capacity for learning. i reckon it takes an atypical degree of curiosity and also self-confidence to engage in any historical revisionism