Search - 4rchive

>>58569727
Well, well, well, if it isn't the Ship of Theseus sailing into Driftveil City.
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_of_Theseus
It’s a thought experiment that attempts to answer the question of how much something can be changed before it can no longer be considered the same thing. The thing is, the answer isn’t clear, the question
>Would it even be your writing at that point?
Would seem like it’s obviously answered “If you use AI as a tool it’s still your work, if AI does the work for you then it’s not your work”. Okay, who determines when it’s a tool and when it’s a substitute? Checking grammar and syntax is obviously a “tool” use, right? But what if I prompt an AI to describe something or feed it a paragraph I wrote and then mix some of the AI’s sentences or words into what I wrote, is the AI now my editor, co-author, or simply giving me suggestions that I can use or reject? Does this mean my work is now only partially mine? What if I use AI to write some paragraphs I’m having difficulty and completely write the others? Is it now even more partially my work or actually not at all?
I’m not going to attempt to answer the question. I don't really know where I stand on the issue, if someone here uploaded AI generated writing then I would just ignore it but I know that at least one person would act like ChatGPT ate their Alcremie for dessert. For the record, I have no plans to use AI in my writing because I think that it would be too difficult to integrate without disrupting my flow and style of writing (process).
Now I’d like to ask, would anyone be interested in an experiment? It would be a simple test between
>What you think is AI or not OR what you think has AI mixed in or not
>Which one you prefer
The purpose of this is not to advocate for AI but rather to inquire what makes scene descriptions good or bad and to learn from that. I’d like paragraph contributions if possible, but I can also write the samples myself.