>>40992163
>>40992174
You gorilla retards, the word Gnostic can first be seen used in early 2nd century
Irenaeus's Against Heresies (Book I, Chapter 11, Section 1):
"There is another Gnostic sect (Gk: ἕτερον γνωστικὸν φῦλον - heteron gnostikon phylon) which has grown out of the followers of Saturninus and Marcion. They call themselves disciples of Matthias, and they propose for themselves the traditions they claim to have received in secret through him."
and even earlier it was most likely used by Justin Martyrs now lost writings against heresies.
Scholars main the phrase proto-Gnosticism as used to refer to that which came before Christ; this is what you subscribe to. You are not Gnostics, you are proto-gnostics, a diverse movement that abscribes to various beliefs such as egyptian mystery schooling, Platonist demiurge concepts, and Zoroastrian dualism. The actual historical Gnostic sects like the Valentinians, Sethians, and Borborites were explicitly CHRISTIAN movements that emerged in the 2nd century. They weren't just repackaging pagan mysticism; they were interpreting the Christian message through a Platonic lens, creating complex systems to explain the problem of evil and the nature of the divine. Your "secret wisdom" is a modern reconstruction, a LARP that ignores the actual theological context of the groups you claim to represent. The fact that you have to deny the very existence of the term "Gnosticism" to make your argument proves you have no historical leg to stand on.