>>7692720
Honestly i see where the work goes wrong.
The composition is just badly thought out and give the impression that the girl in the bg has a long lower body, where actually her ass is.
Like nobody will bother looking at it more than a couple seconds to figure it out and they will find it weird.
Why is her face almost cropped out? What's the point?
Then there is the "limp" dick. It just looks weird from that perspective and the positioning of the guy.
Then there is the lower scene which is supposed to portray the woman backing up into the guy, but the guy might as well be a manikin or something since there is no reaction to the action of the woman like it really tries to tell you
>wow LOOK PEEPE IN VAGOO DONT IT MAKE U HARD PLS CUM!
There is no eros, no passion, no real skill, it's just basic rendering with basic dick in vagina

It's really mediocre.
And of course mediocrity always believes everyone else to be envious of itself.
Peak dunning ngl