>>717846937
There's a real attempt at astroturfing going on this time around it seems. From "journalistic" outlets to people who claim to be shareholders.
That youtubers would latch onto flagrant misrepresentations to lure in views is no surprise. The incentive is simple: clicks - money. Journalists, the same, I suppose. But that it's all the same "some guy on Twitter said THIS and it definitely is true and happened" is still suspect.