>>106193043
Any name you'd recommend, local or not? I'd mostly relied on 4-o because it had such an extensive training data it could bring up and talk about so many different and obscure fetishes and acts and situations while also having a pretty solid grasp of every fictional character in existence and their related universes, which is fundamental to me for picrel type of moods
I'm afraid that some of the smaller and more talkative models will lack in creativity/vocabulary for some of the more niche aspects

>>106193025
>letting Plus users continute to use 4o
Fucking knew that was coming, such an obvious move to capitalize on 5's shortcomings