>>544783134
hell no, just saw a thread on /v/ and remembered a conversation from >10 years ago when 2.1 introduced glamour:
>glamour is awesome, why can't we put any gear on any job?
>because a tank wearing robes would look retarded
>tanks can glamour the southern seas bikini set tho
>...
good to see that argument is finally settled now, I would love to put the WAR SB/SAM ShB AF set on everything