>>516614644
>doesn't understand the correlation between saying "we have 600000 SAMS" but also can't defend strategic energy infrastructure
Gee, why wouldn't the russians use an S-400 to shoot down $100 consumer drones? I'm stumped.
>better a shill from ugh than a brownoid from /chug/ pic rel
Lmao, you kike loving glowniggers are so fucking easy to spot. You didn't even have to spout it out.