>>519402871
>then I've legally sold you a machine gu
AND THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT BECAUSE THE SECOND AMENDMENT ALLOWS US TO BARE ARMS - AND THERE ARE NO RESTRICTIONS WRITTEN IN THAT AMENDMENT
this is full blown redit shit going on here. you come in here pretending to be blind to the "we're going to disarm the niggers only" stance. >>519400648 and they pretend to be blind to your stance.
>even though the one thing you need to do to convert it is illegal to do
there is no such thing as an illegal modification because the second amendment says "shall not be infringed". any law infringing on my right to bare arms OF ANY KIND is invalid. for the same reason contracts to kill can't be contested in court, because it's an illegal contract.
>>519402311
yep. i will be calling glock tomorrow and asking them if this is true and i will be canceling all future purchases if so. i just sold my glock to a friend and because of the government lifting the infringement on suppressors and SBRs i want to buy back the glock i just sold and 2 more that i was curious about. if they're assisting the US government in infringing on our rights then i'm not going to even buy back the model i had or that one on sale right now.
>That was a good defense when Glock switches started getting 3d printed
they are NOT fucking easily 3d printable because the material is too brittle. this is just shit you made up and hope everyone believes, but it doesn't matter anyway because americans are allowed to own machine guns, explosives, WMDs, drones with guns attached to them, chemical weapons, tanks, and every other weapon ever made or that will be made
what we really need is common sense abortion control