>>719223685
>>719223797
Only way to find out the exact reason is asking Nintendo directly, otherwise all we can do is speculation like we have been doing
Except we can both agree Takaki was a moron without principles.

>>719223893
>Very first game is on the eShop
>In 2022
(Can't post a link to deku deal proving it was released in 2022 on the eShop since the link is labeled as spam)
And into the trash your list goes.

>>719223819
If you're referring to Ashcroft v Free speech coalition. You do not want the current Republican supreme court taking up this case given the their love for overturning precedents since it's very likely they'll overturn it and allow a national ban to stand. And as >>719223897 said, in a party line vote they stated that handing over your personal information to a third party database is "only incidentally burdens the protected speech of adults"

>>719119617
Minor correction, there was so push back against the ID laws, but the Republicans who control the US Supreme Court, aka the same party pushing for the ID laws, declared them legal, so there's shit all anyone can do now.

weebs btfo

>>718777574
It doesn't matter, republicans want anime banned because you gotta protect the children from fictional stuff while their leaders molest real kids.
And because republicans control the courts too, any prosecutions will be upheld.
Or much worse, the Republican supreme court will overturn Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition which has been the precedent used to say loli is not CP.

>>718790210
Texas has a long history of going after anime, they were the first state to successfully prosecute someone and it entirely hinged on 'WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN?!'

>>718733167
The Republican Supreme Court already let Texas's ID law designed to ban porn stand.
What makes you think they give a shit about precedent and wouldn't uphold this?

Gentlemen, welcome to the end of Ashcroft v FSC.