>>718797663
>The SC doesn't care how effective it'll be, just if the states are allowed to do it
And they rubber stamped it.
>If there's enough data to show that these laws are ineffective, then that might bolster the case for a follow-up lawsuit claiming the law only exists to burden porn distributors
It wouldn't matter, the republicans will just say no and it will get thrown out.
>This is just FUD. In oral arguments, the republican justices literally said that porn isn't obscenity for adults.
Republicans are re-targeting anime, and given the Robert's court complete disregard for principles, precedent and any standards, it's extremely likely they'll throw out Ashcroft v FSC if the new Texas laws is brought up. That's not fear mongering, it's facts based on their track record.
trump gets all the press, but people don't understand how dangerous the current republican supreme court is to their civil liberties and freedoms.