You see how strongly they resist GME discussion that veers outside their Overton window? Everything I said is on topic and related to GME but that won't stop them from sliding the thread. They will never engage the points. They will just whine. That is what they are paid to do.

>>61079998
I preemptively sneeded you.

>>61080006
It is the only thing I have found to explain why the CUSIP-6 for the bankrupt company was used to issue warrants for the other company. The acquirer (other company) creates a subsidiary to merge with the target (bankrupt company) and the acquirer is the surviving entity. The CUSIP-6 for the bankrupt company is used as a sort of temporary placeholder for settlement, but the shares represented by the warrants continue to use the CUSIP-6 for the acquirer as the surviving company. Provide an alternative explanation (you won't).

When it comes to GME, the GME warrants use the GME CUSIP-6 because GME will be the target and merge with a subsidiary created by whatever the acquirer ends up being. GME shares and warrants will be exchanged for the shares and warrants of the acquirer, as hinted at in the recent GME prospectus discussing share exchanges, units, and purchasing contracts.

>>61080131
Always a good idea