>>713660728
I saw one short of him just defending paid exclusivity because it gives more money to devs to put back into the game. Then he cited satisfactory as an example of a game that made more money, then pinned his own comment responding to a common reply that claims Satisfactory was the only one that did. But all his examples were shit like RDR2, big AAA publisher shit, and games that make all their money off consoles first. None of this is how budgeting revenue works for game development since all this shit does is keep the devs lights on at best while they shit out the next one. What pissed me off was seeing gen alpha and zoomers replying to that pinned comment spouting "OOOOH HE HAD THE RECEIPTS!" because they don't know a god damn thing he says, just that he replied with a big list of skewed names and an arguement nobody said to him.