>>106571717
You were brainwashed into becoming BASED. Politicians will piss in your mouth and you will yell BAAAASEEED, you gobble on that piss, never a thought about braindraining your stupid country have crossed your mind, because that's CRINGE. Retards. Work remotely, go to South America. Several jurisdictions, one language, anti-war topology, and you can actually vote there with your feet. But that's cringe? Mcfucking kill yourself.
4chan Search
4 results for "8c93f9fdb89251cd538c72c41fa688bd"
>>16779533
Let's fucking go you total person.
Data 120 iq autists will always suffer, because there is never enough data to explain everything and therefore putting data above causal model(not mathematical or comp sci, but the inherent one we have as humans). Data is merely supplementary, but reddit people like you will say it's above all.
I do not believe you have any good arguments no matter how hard you consult the best available model on the market.
You are basically banking on that with IQ so high or otherwise extreme intelligence outside of humanly possible there will be some emergent reasoning capabilities fundamentally inaccessible to humans aside from processing and decision making speed. Same way like when low IQ just can't into hypotheticals or projections, unless VR technology is being used.
I personally highly-highly doubt that humanly possible high IQ can't understand the reasoning behind super fast and super intelligent decision making. As long as we can hypothetize and review all possible outcomes, we can reason about it just the same but slower.
Worst I see is prisoners' dilemma, and that means peaceful coexistence
Just in case, I actually have an IQ, unlike you
Let's fucking go you total person.
Data 120 iq autists will always suffer, because there is never enough data to explain everything and therefore putting data above causal model(not mathematical or comp sci, but the inherent one we have as humans). Data is merely supplementary, but reddit people like you will say it's above all.
I do not believe you have any good arguments no matter how hard you consult the best available model on the market.
You are basically banking on that with IQ so high or otherwise extreme intelligence outside of humanly possible there will be some emergent reasoning capabilities fundamentally inaccessible to humans aside from processing and decision making speed. Same way like when low IQ just can't into hypotheticals or projections, unless VR technology is being used.
I personally highly-highly doubt that humanly possible high IQ can't understand the reasoning behind super fast and super intelligent decision making. As long as we can hypothetize and review all possible outcomes, we can reason about it just the same but slower.
Worst I see is prisoners' dilemma, and that means peaceful coexistence
Just in case, I actually have an IQ, unlike you
>>537821746
The CEO of Classic WoW
The CEO of Classic WoW
>>106464631
have you ever encountered a situation in which an interesting tech discussion drowns in related but still retarded posts?
>>106464756
only if you believe in that if i didnt bother to refute some of your points, it then means that you are somehow i dont know, won, if that word is even applicable here
>>106464778
this works only for only a little while then shills adjust
have you ever encountered a situation in which an interesting tech discussion drowns in related but still retarded posts?
>>106464756
only if you believe in that if i didnt bother to refute some of your points, it then means that you are somehow i dont know, won, if that word is even applicable here
>>106464778
this works only for only a little while then shills adjust