>>96745909
If numark4 is just a shittier slight modification of the previous mk4, while all other armors get a facelift, I'll just not buy mk4s. I don't dislike the nu marks in themselves (except mk3 because of the terrible trim, and the way the kits work in general), but at least GW made them different and so you can still keep old designs in your heart (and say it's a variant to appease the autism spirits). The mk4 shown in the tactica journal just looks like a worse version of the BaC mk4.

It's sad, mk4 is my favorite mark, but I'd rather not buy anything than buy something I dislike.
>recasters
Maybe, I did prefer the midhammer version of mk4, with the snoot, flat chest and groin plate