>>149926354
>I loved how they would analyze the pages of whatever comic they were reading, think about what the artist might of been thinking in terms of paneling or grey tones or whatever, and the value of the story, stuff like that.
And they looked at a good mix of stuff. One minute you have that Wizard 90s discussion, then some manga, then some indie stuff, then some niche underground comic, then some big flashy hit. And it wasn't super deep analysis but neither was it pointless, they had plenty to say and it was always fun.

And the sad thing is, this sort of shooting the shit is what people used to do before all this other crap became so all encompassing.