>>513600299
>Nobody claims the universe popped out of nothing[...]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWyN7Jlulo8

Wrong. Atheists do that in regard to the Big Bang theory, which by the way got its name as a pejorative way of referring to Georges Lemaître's "hypothesis of the primeval atom", which I believe he developed partly due to atheistic assertions from that time that the universe had always existed, that it was eternal like God, so as a scientific way to prove our universe's created nature.

>The inteligent design hipothesis has no verifiable proof.

I literally referenced a good book about scientific creationism, and have offered other sources in this thread worth checking out (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aA-FcnLsF1)...

But you can also watch --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCBHNDTEgWk

Your last sentence doesn't make sense to me and shows that you're not really paying attention to my arguments. What straw-man? "It is not evident", then explain why picrel exists as an awesome repeating pattern in an ideal world, why DNA acts like a programming language, the cosmological constant or why the Fibonacci sequence exists. How could these things just appear out of nothing, for no reason, out of materialistic chaos?

Yes, I still believe the burden of proof false on someone claiming our world popped out of nothing for no reason, or acting like it, given previous reasons for a Supreme Creator who has also revealed Himself in the Bible, which contains historical documents and archaelogical references that are verifiable today, like in and near Jerusalem.