>>64080496
>>64080567
This reminds me of Allies strategic bombing of Germany. Chaotic choice of targets, no focus, and no unsustainable damage because of spread of efforts and wrong targets choice.
When Allies concentrated efforts on true bottlenecks: Germany synthetic fuel production, it did strategic damage, but it happened kinda too late. There was another bottleneck: ball bearings production but Allies moved on after they did some damage.

Ukrainians are the same , strikes are too weak and spread.
While I believe Russia has strategic Achilles heel that can attacked by light payload drones. This is oil and gas pipelines in Siberia. These are spread across thousands km and extremely difficult to defend. While themselves are very vulnerable and can be damaged by 10 lbs warhead drones, fire does the rest. Pipes can be replaced but in these far territories it takes much time, it takes time to clear burning pipe from fuel, takes time to fill it again. All that time pipeline isn't operational. If every day there is new breach somewhere along hundreds km length of that pipe it can't be operated.

There is some challenge with with range, they are located 3000 km from Ukraine, but again warhead needed for this target it very small, that make designing such drone simpler.
I believe full focus mass attack against these pipelines is the attack that can did strategic damage to Russia. Oil and gas is fueling everything in Russia and their finances to buy so important for war effort imports. Without oil exports Russia is nothing. And these pipelines can't be replaced with another more resistant transportation.