>>64382041
NTA(s) but they really are surprisingly thin and flimsy. On a kinda related note, M14 mags are surprisingly fucking flimsy IIRC, or at least the commercial ones I've handled are. The Italians at least got that right with their BM59. Those mags are hefty and solid as fuck, at least in comparison by feel.

>>64382687
People have had the feed lips bow even on PMags FWIW, that's why they used to come with a dust cover, to keep the force off the feed lips. Though they just cracked down the spine after enough time.

>>64382974
Samson makes almost exactly that sight FWIW.
>Holy shit the price anon
I know, but still. Looks very good. Ruger might have something similar on ShopRuger; their 75th anniversary rifles had either the Samson rail or a clone but you're a little late on those rifles. Those rails also overhung the front of the receiver and seem to drop down to what appears to be the rear sight dovetail. Not sure if it really attaches or just covers it.

>>64126100
Yeah pretty much. Not sure about the one on that or the anniversary one but Samson sells one very similar for use with the B-TM. No way they didn't get some inspiration. God damn expensive though but it makes the B-TM stock look fucking slick. Like $400 into buying shit for your 10/22 you'll finally complete it lol. Let's say $450 with a Magpul sling.
https://www.samson-mfg.com/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=04-04082-01