>>718926369
Yeah same. It's going to be so immersive and scary and exactly like old RE.

>>718797353
>Still has cutscenes
It has 0 cutscenes woven into gameplay pretending to be gameplay. That's the problem. No amount of you acting as obtuse and retarded as possible pretending it's all the same will change that. No amount, do you understand? RE1 does not have this. This is worse than cutscenes. You are a cocksucking retard.

>>713996280
Fucking based. RE7 gameplay is peak.

>>713302374
>Kek.
Dumb fucking monkey.
>RE4 was made by Mikami.
I know, because unlike you I play Mikami games.
>7 looks more like a proper sequel to RE4
This is 7's aesthetic. 7 looks absolutely nothing like a Mikami game at all. 0%. 7's whole aesthetic is being really dark and limiting your view so it can grab the camera from behind or somewhere offscreen and scare you. No Mikami games are like that even remotely.
>Kek. Now you're gonna argue about semantics?
Shut the fuck up, you ignorant, cocksucking retard. You making a claim and then being completely and objectively wrong on all levels isn't semantics. You said RE was all about originality, I showed you that it's not. That's not semantics, that's just your ignorance making you look like a fool because you're arguing about game genres you know nothing about.
>the fact that 7 is still more similar to the classic RE formula than RE5 or RE6.
Wrong. It has surface level similarities and nothing else. Only someone who doesn't play RE games would think 7 is like RE1 because it takes place in a house and has a similar shotgun contraption. In terms of pacing, level design, combat and most importantly replayability, 7 couldn't possibly be further away from the original games.