>>720166991
>Again, you're also operating under the idea that a rewrite would HAVE to have happened after 6.55. Which not only isn't true but even if it was nothing Wuk Lamat says in 6.55 prevents a sympathetic motivation from being possible.
If he was rewritten before even being introduced it wasn't a rewrite, it's a different foundation than you thought it would be
Nonsense position to hold