>>17976259
>I've also noticed this. When "Christians" here get into arguments, they always spew some really weird shit. It certainly isn't any theological understanding that has been agreed upon by any historical creed.
This happens every time someone posts a thread about the Trinity. Some TradCath larper calls you a retard and explains how the Trinity is “so simple to a high-IQ white man like me.” They then proceed to espouse some Medieval heresy that would have got them executed a few centuries ago.
>They can't even cope with their heresies by saying
>uh those specific Christians are ackshoaly wrong
>Because the stuff they spew on this board is fundamentally wrong about things that most Christians IRL would agree on regardless of denomination.
While this is true, they’re also doubly wrong because most of them claim to be Catholic or Orthodox because it’s “based” even though they know neither about those churches’ theologies. They just kinda assume that their personal opinions reflect the Vatican’s opinions, even though there’s published documents proving the contrary.
