>>513597569
If you’re having conversations about something that has existed for 2,000 years at least.
You’ve lost. You’re completely out of touch, and if you appeal to rationalism, the basis for this contradicts your conclusion because man is already irrational by your presupposition. It’s not even a strawman.
You clearly don’t like Christianity. And you think it’s irrational. Here you are arguing with people that subscribe to it, as if they are rational under the same logic, and then you pretend the basis for something existing for 2,000 years is out of sheer stupidity, but then turn around again, and pretend that these people can be reasoned with.
You are unironically more disingenous for hating someone who collectively ended religious oppression with his own life in one act of self sacrifice, and pretend like the people who actively ignore what he did are representatives of the faith, meanwhile the awkwardity of your position presupposed religion is necessary, but for some reason or another, you retards always manage to deny that Christ’s death was not only unnecessary, but that the kikes weren’t directly responsible for it.
Just go fuck yourselves you insufferable twats. Jesus fucking Christ. Get over it, you crucified God. Insufferable pedantic narcissistic race.
Can’t even stop to recognize that he allowed it because he loves you.
>I await the pedantic strawman from ‘anons’ that wish to waste time misrepresenting something they don’t believe in with arguements from the fucking reformation era.
