>>717567214
The point was made that "Its THE OLD design they went back to", so you aren't really changing the argument much.
But still - the only common parts are the nostrils. The face shape is entirely different and are clearly Rare in origin. Not to mention that the REAL classic design looks absolutely nothing like the three, lacking the "hairstyle" for starters. I remember there being a fan edit circling around with all 3 kongs with very faithful Rare and Miyamoto bananza versions, and you could really see the differences there.
Its not OG kong design, and never was. I'd actually prefer if they straight up used Miyamoto's design rather than this amalgamation.
>>717567372
>Gets called out on blatantly lying
>"haha Personal opinions" because i used a word shit
I rest my case.