>>718411281
>retard doesn't understand that tiny mavics are on a completely different tactical level than those huge military drones
None of those systems are able to reliably spot and react to FPV drones, no to mention a high altitude drops from drones. They fly either super low, or super high and are too tiny. They can land anywhere on the battlefield and react to motion, prompting the operator to take off and hit the target if they spot something. No modern APS is capable of hitting drones.

>>718411480
>he thinks it's a confirmation bias
There were a shitton of videos using Javelins and NLAWs at the very first stages of conflict, however they quickly became completely outmatched by drones. There is literally no counter to them.