>>717873337
That's because it's all garbage now. When it gets better he'll reconsider. And that's because it's a gradual process and it's hard to draw a line.
Does a game that only generated combat animations as AI where the user has described in great detail what he actually wants?
What if the AI gets freedom with vague promps like "generate gameplay" and the user uses that as a baseline and improves it?
What if the user makes the combat and runs it through AI for imrpovements?
People are gonna debate these things and the luddite purists are gonna push normies to the AI side with their obnoxious behaviour. Not unlike politics.
