>>17929020
>It has no basis in moralism or "rights" at all, it was set in understanding historical processes through a material lens using the scientific process.
I agree with that. I think it's useful to think of it like a scientist or something.

>It's perfectly "Marxist" to claim that Feudalism will likely be the next stage after current Capitalism, if the material conditions lean more towards Feudalism.
Yes, on the condition that it's a big if, though. I do see a lot of people moralizing about weird gender people but not analyzing what material conditions contributed to it, without moralization. I don't know what Marx's own personal opinions were about various things but I do know he had zero nostalgia for pre-capitalist social relations and predicted that capital would transform the entire world in an IRREVERSIBLE manner. This of course creates all kinds of vibes:
https://youtu.be/ujGriZmmRP4