Why do people pretend the only difference between these two men is their "body language", "confidence", and "personality"? How long can we keep the delusion up? Let's admit life is fake and shallow. Girlfriends and success in life has very little to do with "hard work" or "merit". There are no deep complicated layers of "context" and "nuance". It's exactly what it appears to be.

The myth or narrative of meritocracy plays a vital role in maintaining faith in the sexual market, particularly in its current form. Here's why:

1. Legitimizing Inequality. Meritocracy suggests that success is based on talent and effort. This makes dating inequality seem justifiable -- if people believe that the sexually active men got way they are through hard work and ability, then inequality is perceived as fair. Without this belief, the vast disparities might provoke more resistance or calls for redistribution. If people believe that those who are successful in sex "earned" it, then rejection or loneliness is seen as a personal shortcoming rather than a systemic issue.

2. Motivation and Compliance. If people believe that they can improve their position through hard work, they are more likely to buy into the system and strive within it, even if statistically the odds are stacked against them. This belief encourages productivity, ambition, consumerism, and social stability.

3. Obscuring Structural Barriers. The idea of meritocracy can obscure the role of systemic advantages -- like inherited neurotypicality, good looks, and social networks. If everyone is assumed to start on a level playing field, structural critiques of the dating scene lose some of their rhetorical force.

4. Self-Blame and Reduced Solidarity. When people fail in a supposed meritocracy, they may blame themselves rather than the system. This can reduce political mobilization or solidarity among disadvantaged groups, as they internalize failure instead of recognizing broader systemic problems.

In short, pretending we live in a meritocracy is a kind of ideological glue -- not essential to the sexual market per se, but very useful in maintaining public confidence in a deeply unequal system.

Life isn't about actions, merit, or the content of your character. It's about what wavelength you were born on, what genetic lineages you're from, and what physical traits you were born with. The rest is automatic. Normies will deny this though and viciously pretend they treat people based on "how much respect they've earned".

The reason incels never have sex is because of the genes, face, and neurology they was born with and how this society treats it. Not because they "believe" or "don't believe" in the correct thing.

Why do we keep gaslighting incels and struggling young men with painfully fake lies? Is it to stop them from committing suicide?

A homeless guy with a Norwood 0 hairline looks "cleaner" than a successful guy with Norwood 3 who showers 20 times a day. It is what it is. Incels look dirty and icky. I wish I could give you the run of the mill "it's your personality" gaslighting but it ain't. Chad could have any personality in the world and get called confidence (even emo). Meanwhile everything you do will always be weird, desperate, awkward. lol.

What is that song, where the women is singing about her boyfriend cheating / leaving her? He called her smart, and perfect and he left her anyways.

>>81562628

>"You're alone because you're not trying hard enough".

Why are they still repeating this shit?