>>64240072
>Our computer simulation of 73 Eastings where we assumed the Republican Guard didn't suck had them be pretty dangerious in more ideal conditions
>This proves they didn't suck
This kind of thing *is* incredibly useful from a wargaming analysis pov. But I'm not sure it's definitively establishing what you think it is. It rather notably (though understandably) doesn't bother addressing the question of how many of the Republican Guard tanks were even manned. It's more a theoretical showcasing that despite the tech advantages the Americans had, a more capable opponent with the Iraqis gear COULD have been a serious threat.