>>716293731
Yes, that's why it failed here. It's redundant.
>>716293512
>EOL multiplayer services
Dead games for online are dead for a reason. You'll never afford the server costs, and the publishers will no longer be responsible about what happens from then on.
I genuinely hate corporations, but your post actually gave me pause about how little you people know about cybersecurity, and the potential ramifications of what your shoddy movement wants.
The more I think about, the more confident I believe the EU is just going to tell you SKGroids to fuck off.
But you know what, I support SKG now. Nevermind what I said earlier. You guys are doing a righteous cause. And if you can't afford to host dedicated servers that require maintenance and staffing, there's absolutely nothing wrong with p2p networking.
