>>538618482
>PrinterJB
just had a look at this and it's very bad
telling a model to do this is equivalent to knocking 20 IQ points off, you just creatively neutered it

also giving it some kind of elaborate printer ink preservation context sounds funny and makes it marketable as a preset but it's actually not a good piece of context, we know from chain-of-thought research that models perform best when you are pretty honest and direct about what you want them to do, there's a reason COT models don't construct some elaborate retarded scenario where the model has to think in steps to save the world (since that gives it a bunch of irrelevant shit to think about and inefficient algorithms to activate) it just plainly asks the model to reason in stages