>>64142075
>Did you ask yourself why?
Not particularly in truth, I just kind of did a quick google search and the thing I read said they were great for home invasion and that was really it. I just assumed cause it was an indoor/enclosed area that was the reason they were ‘good’. Should I perhaps look at a different type of gun instead to suit her needs?
>They should have guards at the door. Dedicated maid guards, if you like.
Without going too into the details there are other maid guards (4) but they aren’t allowed to patrol/guard the area because they’re supposed to “not exist” and be a deniable asset (political fuckery blah blah blah). The people watching the doors are basically hired to seem unassuming to onlookers and die with the expectation they set off the alarm before doing so
>something old, expensive, yet still suitable for multiple attackers, would be something like presentation model Auto-5 or Winchester 1887/1901
The auto-5 has a really nice look to it, I like how many rounded edges it seems to have. The video I saw of it in action seems like it’d be great for blasting down hallways. The Winchester seems like it’d be good too but for some reason I don’t feel as drawn to it.
>Is there only one maid?
Technically no; there are other maids in the mansion (‘combat’ maids, who are supposed to be well trained and deniable security assets, and normal maids with no combat skill whatsoever.) The other combat maids on duty are usually overseeing different areas of the mansion, and the mansion is so big that in the circumstance of an intrusion they’re largely going to be fighting solo most of the time. Normal maids are expected to bunker down and wait it out until things are all clear. The multiple shotguns thing is cool though not gonna lie, but I don’t want to push things too far into the realm of crazy.
>>64142655
Not far off what’s gonna be happening desu