ALL cancer research and oncology clinics are controlled opposition.
>Depending solely on "proven" but sadistic treatment options from 50 years ago even though they only half-work, injure the victim and promote future cancer growth
>Saying "The evidence isn't there yet" for better options, while never lifting a finger to look for evidence
>Extreme hostility towards success stories from novel solutions
>Extreme hostility towards even talking about investigating better alternatives

Think about how you would behave if you wanted to solve a life or death problem, and had lots of funding. You'd be actively trying multiple new things and gathering as much data as possible. You wouldn't be actively smothering and blacklisting the people claiming success from following new leads. You wouldn't be passively saying "the data on that just isn't in yet" and then 25 years later still making exactly the same excuse.

Check out this sicko.
Director of cancer treatment (medical oncology i.e. chemo, radiotherapy, etc.) for a network of 10 public hospital locations across Melbourne, Australia.

He's so quotable:
>"When a patient dies, I don't see it as a failure"

Literally murders a young male patient using euthanasia then says this about it:
>"The cancer may have killed them, but they defeated the cancer in my opinion"

Australia has world's highest cancer rates. They poison everybody.
If you live in Australia, get cancer from eating sliced bread or hot chip and rely on the government hospital system, start praying to God, because they're running some kind of death cult down there.