>>24611266
History isn't over, and I said "intelligent people" not intellectuals. Those who actually lead revolutions are leaders advised by intellectuals, not intellectuals.

Qott: have you ever encountered a raccoon before?

>>40393416

>>24544857
I have NEVER EVER heard an actual refutation of Gnosticism of any substance. It's ALWAYS along the lines of
>b-but it's heresy!
>S-some guy just le made it up!
>It was a cult!
I have actively TRIED to not believe in Gnosticism once I learned about it, but I CAN'T. I literally CAN'T NOT believe in this because it explains everything about existence perfectly. And again, I have NEVER NOT ONCE NOT ONE TIME come across an actual refutation of substance that wasn't just demonic screeching that the game got found out.

American cities are war zones. If you must enter them for some reason, you better be packing some heat.