>>18101405
>Female sample lmao
We're all getting the benefit of the doubt, but there's no confirmation whatsoever that it's a female sample, other than conflicting accounts from Indians. Please elaborate.
>we know from swat that indian took steppe and bmac women.
I've already explained in another thread why Swat** should not be used as a steppe metric for India, but to refresh some minds, most Iron Age peoples of the Swat Valley cannot be simply modeled as a mixture of Indus_Periphery and Steppe_MLBA. They appear to have a similar ancestry to Shahr_I_Sokhta_BA1.
Furthermore, qpAdm suggests this. Steppe ancestry was mediated by men. You're misinterpreting the data. Does any peer-reviewed article say it's not patrilineal? No article I've found using the genome project says it's patrilineal.
>This is nothing surprising we already knew from narasimhan 2019 paper see
See above. Swat valley It is not the steppe vector and much less Indo-Aryan,
It is not the steppe vector, much less Indo-Aryan. Elena Kuz'mina's, who has been well cited in several articles, unlike accounts or blogs like Hail Shieva, says that the region underwent an amalgamation of cultures and cannot be reduced to culture A, B, or C based on their funeral rites, but dismissed it abeing Indo-Aryan.
>sappali is 100% not steppe stop lying
bizarre reading level, did you at least correctly interpret what I told you...? It was not mentioned anywhere that these cultures were entirely Indo-European, but you must accept sooner or later Sapalli culture does indeed have steppe influence, there is _o with steppe and as recently they’ve discovered steppe pottery at their burials. but this last one is too much for a "history" forum where people treat everything as some kind of anime battle.