>>19237081
He went spastic in this episode about triple H possibly winning Booker of the year . He started just naming all the reasons why he shouldn’t win then starts saying Tony killed all his momentum with the new Nielsen ratings . You would think he would have said CMLL boomer but then said
> yeh well no one knows who the booker of CMLL is
Kek
4chan Search
2 results for "a31bfa5c0aef7f6cd8c294f0202ccefb"
Tony/Triple H share more DNA with Bischoff than Vince
> both have to constantly remind the audience who’s in charge
Tony goes on X/Twitter to explain or defend booking decisions, ratings, or storylines.
Triple H often drops subtle “game” references in press conferences or PLEs, making it clear he is steering the creative ship.
That mirrors Bischoff, who in WCW blended real-life authority with on-screen presence, constantly reinforcing that he was the power behind the product.
> Tony/Triple H do this public booker rather than a private booker like Vince was
Bischoff and Khan are both “media bookers.” They thrive on the meta aspect giving interviews, making announcements, and shaping narratives in public.
Triple H, while more controlled, also uses pressers and subtle PR framing to communicate his “vision.”
Vince? Total opposite. He rarely explained creative publicly ,the show was the message.
> Ego and control vs. illusion of collaboration
Vince ruled with total control and wanted to maintain the illusion that the fans didn’t need to know who was in charge. Tony and Triple H both market their leadership. There’s a sense of “trust me, I get it I’m one of you.” That’s very Bischoff 1996, appealing to the smarks who’s aware of the business.
I think Vince was the invisible hand, Bischoff was the on-camera executive, and Tony/Triple H are the modern hybrid — part promoter, part performer.
Tony goes on X/Twitter to explain or defend booking decisions, ratings, or storylines.
Triple H often drops subtle “game” references in press conferences or PLEs, making it clear he is steering the creative ship.
That mirrors Bischoff, who in WCW blended real-life authority with on-screen presence, constantly reinforcing that he was the power behind the product.
> Tony/Triple H do this public booker rather than a private booker like Vince was
Bischoff and Khan are both “media bookers.” They thrive on the meta aspect giving interviews, making announcements, and shaping narratives in public.
Triple H, while more controlled, also uses pressers and subtle PR framing to communicate his “vision.”
Vince? Total opposite. He rarely explained creative publicly ,the show was the message.
> Ego and control vs. illusion of collaboration
Vince ruled with total control and wanted to maintain the illusion that the fans didn’t need to know who was in charge. Tony and Triple H both market their leadership. There’s a sense of “trust me, I get it I’m one of you.” That’s very Bischoff 1996, appealing to the smarks who’s aware of the business.
I think Vince was the invisible hand, Bischoff was the on-camera executive, and Tony/Triple H are the modern hybrid — part promoter, part performer.