>>40737830
>you didn't bring any facts you said lol scientists do it when like they have an arbitrary amount of problem fucking
bro... screenshot
>ah and so that makes it fundamentally true, if that's how it's typically defined, I bet there's no problem with this logic if we look historically at how things were defined
disproves nothing

> do you think wasps are more related to each other than they are to bees?
yes...? retard
>do you think wasps are one species?
nope! there are multiple layers to taxonomy

For example a typical european honey bee is Apis mellifera, a common wasp is Vespula vulgaris. They are different species but they are part of the order Hymenoptera. They are related but not the same
>do a google mate
i did nothing came up of it you're lying
>we call some things wasps and some things bees not based on their ability to breed with each other but their behaviours, they did not just split off from wasps in some neat divergence
bro you're so fucking retarded holy shit bees cannot be wasps simply because they literally are genetically not the same and are very distantly related. like a cow can't be a wolf just because a cow walks on four legs

>no we don't

goddamn it you're actually making me mad stop. i know you're trolling but stop. a bee being a wasp or not doesn't even have anything to do with your gender

>>40737840
>embarrassing go back to the sharty
i would but its boring and mostly just spam...
>>40737853
you'll never be me, stop.