>>17941766
I think you guys are going to completely screw this up. It's an issue of unintended consequences from all the airtime and cultural energy you pour into it. It's like the Streisand Effect where trying to suppress a thing ends up drawing more attention to than it otherwise would've gotten.

This happens in politics a lot. The New Left in the 60s rebelled against the Democrats which had a much more closed-primary system, and one of the consquences was the party opening up the primary system more starting in 1968 (or in the aftermath of that), but the result is that candidates with even more money were the ones who had a better chance of winning the primaries compared to the old machine-style system that elected FDR.

Real fundamentalists (like the Amish) in my opinion shouldn't even want to TALK about this, but these holy rollers just want to beat up troons every day because they think it'll help the Republicans slice up the electorate and win over people who would otherwise not accept their policies.

James Dobson died recently and he made a career out of fighting gays, and now look at the situation. Yeah, let's all have a big debate about gay marriage in the 1990s! Talk about it's a threat to marriage. Ha ha. Once you open that door... and he was also also a Freudian psychologist, a big fan of corporal punishment as a child-rearing practice and believed showering with your son so he can see your monster cock will make him straight. Anyways.